The Stock Exchange of Thailand - Listed companies with reported concessions

List of listed companies which disclosed about receiving concessions from the state or being a contracting party to a state with a monopolistic nature.

As of 20 May 2022

No	Symbol	Company Name
The information regarding the listed companies' concession shown on this website is only preliminary information that SET has received from the listed companies whose have disclosed their information about acquiring or receiving concession at the time the information being disclosed. However, SET and the listed companies cannot certify or guarantee any reliability, completeness, accuracy, recency, or appropriateness of the information and shall not be responsible for any negative outcome from using the information. Also, the users shall consider the warning with care. Furthermore, the users shall study any additional information from the related documents of the listed companies to verify the accuracy and recency of the information. Moreover, the users who has entered and used this website have accepted and agreed to the term and conditions of this website. The details of the term and conditions of using this website can be found in the following link.
1.	ADVANC	ADVANCED INFO SERVICE PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
2.	AKP	AKKHIE PRAKARN PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
3.	BA	BANGKOK AIRWAYS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
4.	BAFS	BANGKOK AVIATION FUEL SERVICES PCL.
5.	BEC	BEC WORLD PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
6.	BEM	BANGKOK EXPRESSWAY AND METRO PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
7.	BEYOND	BOUND AND BEYOND PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
8.	BTS	BTS GROUP HOLDINGS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
9.	BTSGIF	BTS RAIL MASS TRANSIT GROWTH INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
10.	BTW	BT WEALTH INDUSTRIES PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
11.	BWG	BETTER WORLD GREEN PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
12.	CMAN	CHEMEMAN PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
13.	DMT	DON MUANG TOLLWAY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
14.	DTAC	TOTAL ACCESS COMMUNICATION PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
15.	EASTW	EASTERN WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT PCL.
16.	GRAMMY	GMM GRAMMY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
17.	HYDRO	HYDROTEK PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
18.	INTUCH	INTOUCH HOLDINGS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
19.	JAS	JASMINE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
20.	JKN	JKN GLOBAL GROUP PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
21.	JWD	JWD INFOLOGISTICS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
22.	KWC	KRUNGDHEP SOPHON PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
23.	LST	LAM SOON (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
24.	MCOT	MCOT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
25.	MONO	MONO NEXT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
26.	NATION	NATION GROUP (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
27.	NBC	NATION BROADCASTING CORPORATION PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
28.	NFC	NFC PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
29.	NYT	NAMYONG TERMINAL PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
30.	ONEE	THE ONE ENTERPRISE PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
31.	PTT	PTT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
32.	PTTEP	PTT EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
33.	PTTGC	PTT GLOBAL CHEMICAL PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
34.	RS	RS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
35.	SCC	THE SIAM CEMENT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
36.	SCCC	SIAM CITY CEMENT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
37.	SOLAR	SOLARTRON PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
38.	SR	SIAMRAJ PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
39.	TFI	THAI FILM INDUSTRIES PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
40.	TGCI	THAI-GERMAN CERAMIC INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
41.	THCOM	THAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
42.	TPIPL	TPI POLENE PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
43.	TTW	TTW PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
44.	UPOIC	UNITED PALM OIL INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
45.	UVAN	UNIVANICH PALM OIL PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED
46.	WORK	WORKPOINT ENTERTAINMENT PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

* List of listed companies which disclosed about receiving concessions from the state or being a contracting party to a state is updated daily at the end of the day.

Definition

As the Constitutional court of Thailand has not explicitly defined the definition and meaning of “being given concession” and “Being a party of monopoly state contract” including “directly or indirectly”. To serve as a guideline for listed companies to consider whether they have or being given concession from the state or being a party of monopoly state contact directly or indirectly, SET has gathered preliminary information about the definition and meaning of the aforementioned words and phrases from Constitutional court of Thailand and National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) consisting of judicial decisions or opinions in memorandum of discussion relating to interpretation and meaning of the aforementioned words and phrases, which can be summarized as follows.

Wording	Interpretation and meaning from the memorandum of discussion
Concession	The judicial decision of the Constitutional Court of Thailand No. 12-14/2553 on November 3rd 2010 Concession granted by the state is when the state gives rights to company or individual to utilize country’s natural resources or benefit from public interests. Concession includes permits issued by the state whether or not the permits have monopoly characteristics.
Being a party of a monopoly state contract.	The memorandum of discussion of National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) No. NC 0028/0021 on April 2nd 2013 In case of a mayor has become a state lottery distribution representative via lottery distributor machine with the Government Lottery Office, if the representative contract is in the form of exclusive rights given to company or individual and no other companies or individuals have the rights to operate such businesses or tasks as mentioned in the contract, it could be said that the mayor is a party in a monopoly state contract with a state enterprise entity. For the mayor to be a party in a monopoly state contract is prohibited under section 100(3) of the Organic Law on Counter Corruption and section 265(2) and section 284 of the Constitutional law of the Kingdom of Thailand.
Directly or indirectly	The judicial decision of Constitutional Court of Thailand No. 12-14/2553 on November 3rd 2010 The prohibition to directly or indirectly operate or be a part of forbidden businesses according to the constitution law of Thailand intends to prohibit any action that can be used or influenced to hold interests in forbidden businesses in accordance with the Constitution law. The prescription under such section will also intend to include the matter in relation of holding shares in companies that do not operate the forbidden businesses directly but the companies are holding shares in other companies that operate forbidden businesses which accounts as indirectly being a part of forbidden business. And it can be seen that Company A is operating in retail oil business. Although the Company is not the one which have been granted monopoly concession or being a party in a state concession contact, but Company A is a holding company which holds shares in Company B which have been granted concession by the state. Therefore holding shares in company B is forbidden and holding shares in company A is the same as holding shares in a company with forbidden business indirectly.

Wording

Interpretation and meaning from the memorandum of discussion

Concession

The judicial decision of the Constitutional Court of Thailand No. 12-14/2553 on November 3rd 2010

Concession granted by the state is when the state gives rights to company or individual to utilize country’s natural resources or benefit from public interests. Concession includes permits issued by the state whether or not the permits have monopoly characteristics.

Being a party of a monopoly state contract.

The memorandum of discussion of National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) No. NC 0028/0021 on April 2nd 2013

In case of a mayor has become a state lottery distribution representative via lottery distributor machine with the Government Lottery Office, if the representative contract is in the form of exclusive rights given to company or individual and no other companies or individuals have the rights to operate such businesses or tasks as mentioned in the contract, it could be said that the mayor is a party in a monopoly state contract with a state enterprise entity. For the mayor to be a party in a monopoly state contract is prohibited under section 100(3) of the Organic Law on Counter Corruption and section 265(2) and section 284 of the Constitutional law of the Kingdom of Thailand.

Directly or indirectly

The judicial decision of Constitutional Court of Thailand No. 12-14/2553 on November 3rd 2010

The prohibition to directly or indirectly operate or be a part of forbidden businesses according to the constitution law of Thailand intends to prohibit any action that can be used or influenced to hold interests in forbidden businesses in accordance with the Constitution law. The prescription under such section will also intend to include the matter in relation of holding shares in companies that do not operate the forbidden businesses directly but the companies are holding shares in other companies that operate forbidden businesses which accounts as indirectly being a part of forbidden business.

And it can be seen that Company A is operating in retail oil business. Although the Company is not the one which have been granted monopoly concession or being a party in a state concession contact, but Company A is a holding company which holds shares in Company B which have been granted concession by the state. Therefore holding shares in company B is forbidden and holding shares in company A is the same as holding shares in a company with forbidden business indirectly.